You are viewing an old version of this page. Return to the latest version.
Difference between revisions of "Textual descriptions in mathematics"
(Tag: 2017 source edit) |
(Tag: 2017 source edit) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
short summary | short summary | ||
| Line 40: | Line 38: | ||
<br /> | <br /> | ||
==External Links== | ==External Links== | ||
| + | [[Category:decoding work]] | ||
[[Category:Mathematics]] | [[Category:Mathematics]] | ||
| + | [[Category:set theory]] | ||
Revision as of 18:16, 5 September 2020
short summary
Contents
Decoding work done
Identification of bottleneck
Given statements in natural language involving set descriptions or quantifiers students find it difficult to formalize such statements, in particular if there is more than one quantifier involved.
Give specific example heire
Description of mental tasks needed to overcome the bottleneck
Parsing ... Good Enough Theory
Modelling the tasks
....
Practice and Feedback
...
Anticipate and lessen resistance
...
Assessment of student mastery
...
Sharing
...
Researchers involved
Peter Riegler
See also
Notes
References
Riegler, Peter (2019): Lost in Language Comprehension: Decoding putatively extra-disciplinary expertise. In Proceedings of EuroSoTL19: Exploring new fields through the scholarship of teaching and learning, Bilbao, 685-691