Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.

Difference between revisions of "Applying the Decoding the Disciplines process to teaching structural mechanics: An autoethnographic case study"

(Changed categories.)
(Changed categories.)
 
(No difference)

Latest revision as of 20:14, 6 December 2024

Abstract

Using case study methodology and autoethnographic methods, this study examines a process of curricular development known as Decoding the Disciplines (Decoding) by documenting the experience of its application in a construction engineering mechanics course. Motivated by the call to integrate what is known about teaching and learning with what is known about engineering, this study provides a detailed example of the Decoding process and illuminates its nuances in order to inform engineering educators who may not be familiar with research-based educational methods. The results indicate that the Decoding process is applicable in the field of construction engineering mechanics, and can provide a solid framework for personal reflection and curricular improvement. This study provides some guidance for applying the Decoding process and a motivation for transforming personal educational practice into a scholarship of teaching and learning. For such scholarship to flourish, there is a need to restructure the rewards system in higher education and implement policy change that encourages a culture of excellence in teaching and learning.

Bibliographic data

Tingerthal, John Steven. Applying the Decoding the Disciplines process to teaching structural mechanics: An autoethnographic case study. Diss. Northern Arizona University, 2013.

External source

https://scholar.google.com/scholar?oi=bibs&cluster=413541486917694943&btnI=1&hl=en